At Excell Security, we are committed to ensuring the safety and wellbeing of our clients and the community. Our slogan “Protecting What Matters” is at the heart of what we do every day.
In line with this commitment is an interest in not only the measures that keep people safe in terms of security practices, but also the perceptions of the community when it comes to safety and security. We came across a recently completed study – reasonably robust and pertinent in its scope as it encompassed over 12,000 respondents across Australia and Germany – which made some noteworthy findings about how differing demographics perceive neighbourhood safety.
As reproduced from www.miragenews.com:
Older people living in disadvantaged neighbourhoods are not significantly affected by a fear of crime compared to younger populations, researchers from Australia and Germany have discovered.
They are, however, considerably more fearful than younger people in better-off neighbourhoods with low levels of crime.
The researchers, Associate Professor Rebecca Wickes from Monash University in Melbourne, Dr Göran Köber from the University of Freiburg and Professor Dietrich Oberwittler from Max Planck Institute for the Study of Crime, Security and Law, tabled their findings in the journal of Ageing & Society.
Their paper, Old age and fear of crime: cross-national evidence for a decreased impact of neighbourhood disadvantage in older age, investigated age and neighbourhood disadvantage using two independent surveys comprising 12,620 respondents aged 25-90 residing in 435 neighbourhoods in four cities in Germany and Australia.
Researchers inferred that younger people have stronger reactions to neighbourhood social conditions in expressing fear, whereas older people show high levels of fear irrespective of neighbourhood contexts.
There are very few studies that have systematically investigated how neighbourhoods impact safety perceptions – or wellbeing more generally – by comparing different age cohorts living in similar kinds of places.
Data from Australian and German cities were used to make findings more robust, with both countries belonging to the group of highly developed nations and having a similar per capita GDP and unemployment rate.
Social disadvantage was measured by unemployment rates and police-recorded neighbourhood crime rates.
“There is a strongly-held belief that older people experience heightened levels of fear of crime disproportionate to the actual risks,” Associate Professor Wickes said.
“Our analysis found, however, it is far more nuanced than that. Residents of all ages who live in areas of concentrated disadvantage have more reason to express anxieties about social and economic threats.
“The very high fear levels of older residents in better-off neighbourhoods suggest that their safety perceptions are out of proportion with real neighbourhood conditions, and hence must be influenced by other factors distinctive to their age group.”
In their analysis, researchers found:
- Female respondents reported more fear than male respondents, and age was related to fear: older respondents are more fearful
- Lower-educated and poorer people were more fearful compared to higher-educated and more affluent people
- Migration background did not affect fear of crime in either country
- In Australia, both people who moved into a neighbourhood recently and who lived there for more than 20 years reported slightly less fear
- Rates of unemployment were associated with increased localised fear in both countries
- Neighbourhood attachment had a strong association with fear – low attachment was associated with increased localised fear.
“We see that the reduced impact of neighbourhood disadvantage on localised fear in older residents is likely due to their higher levels of neighbourhood attachment – essentially a strong ‘sense of place identity’ protects them,” Associate Professor Wickes said.
“These findings have important implications for governments and policy makers in addressing the needs of older community members. Both those in disadvantaged neighbourhoods and those in middle-class neighbourhoods could benefit from programs that improve their subjective security.”
To investigate Australian neighbourhoods, researchers used data from the Australian Community Capacity Study which was conducted in 2010 as a computer-assisted telephone interview survey in 295 neighbourhoods in Brisbane (Wave 3) and Melbourne (Wave 1). For Germany, the first wave of the SENSIKO study conducted in 2014 was used, a postal survey in 140 neighbourhoods in Cologne and Essen. Both surveys used sampling frames of the general adult population residing in private dwellings – from age 18 in Australia and 25-90 years in Germany.